Is it possible to rank above wikipedia

As such, people continue to spam the site in an attempt to increase their page rank, just not as badly as they did before. Wikipedia causes what I like to refer to as the boomerang effect. The way it works is simple. We already know that Wikipedia ranks high in search.

When there is a link in a high ranking Wikipedia article, it tends to bring the references along with it. So links that generally may not have a high page rank, will increase in rank simply from the rank and weight of the Wikipedia article.

Let me show you what this looks like. When I do a Google search for the topic, you can see numerous search results, one of which is from the website DanDare. The site has a pagerank of 3, but a domain authority of 31 and approximately backlinks to its site. However, it outranks Amazon. Despite not being as authoritative as Amazon. If you look at the Wikipedia page for Luck of the Legion , the Dandare.

If you look at the bottom of the search results above, you will even see that a blog from Blogger made it to the first page of results. Guess what? This concept is something I have preached to reputation management companies for years. While Wikipedia has been used for reputation management purposes, I advise them to steer clear of it for ORM. Record these questions. After you have analyzed the questions you want your web pages to be featured for, answer them clearly.

Each step is clearly numbered and gives exact directions. Your web page for the Featured Snippet needs to have more content on it than just the answer to the query. Include the search query in your header, with the answer found directly below it. The content you wish to be a Featured Snippet should begin in the same way you would logically begin an answer to the question. As with all matters related to SEO, experimentation will provide you with more insight in how these systems work and allow you to develop an effective content marketing strategy.

If your first attempts at trying to rank as a Featured Snippet fail, keep trying. After all, the benefit of being able to rank ahead of such sites as Wikipedia is immense in gaining your website higher visibility.

Question Mark Image. Not only do people love Wikipedia; they love linking to Wikipedia. According to Alexa, Wikipedia has earned backlinks from nearly two million other websites.

These backlinks have boosted its standing with Google. Links remain an important ranking factor in Google. The powerful fresh content that appears on Wikipedia earns links. Five years ago, you could point a ton of links to your homepage, watch your pagerank go up and wait for the traffic to start rolling in.

Those days came to a screeching halt when Google decided that deep links looked more natural. Since Wikipedia is highly cited as a source, it has numerous links to internal articles. Their page on Alexander the Great has massive backlinks from other web pages across the Internet, which signals to Google that it is a highly reputable article.

Many Wikipedia pages link to over other Wikipedia articles. One of the unique things about Wikipedia is its heavy dependence on user-generated content UGC. By relying on its user base, Wikipedia has been able to amass millions of pages of content that are frequently updated.

However, the data is likely dated, because scrolling through random pages on the site now shows that they seem to be much longer in Articles covering most major topics tend to be much longer.

For example, the article on Alexander the Great is a whopping 11, words. The official Wikipedia page of George W. Bush is almost 15, Wikipedia pages tend to be much longer, which might help explain their high SERP rankings. In addition to providing long, detailed articles, Wikipedia makes sure its content provides numerous links in a very organized format.

Readers are likely to keep using Wikipedia for their research. As a result, they stay on the site longer. Satisfied users can only mean good things for SEO. Wikipedia has strict policies on citing sources to support all articles. Citing sources both improves trust and enhances the quality of the product that search engines send traffic to.

If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it. Too many publishers have tried copying information from other websites and citing sources to improve their rankings. Google has spoken harshly against this practice.

Wikipedia outperforms these publishers by using numerous sources and curating their content in a format that provides value to their readers.

Virtually anyone that has owned a website with web forms has had to deal with black hat SEOs at one point or another. Every spammer on the Internet wants to get backlinks from an authoritative site like Wikipedia. If you allow unnatural links or links to bad neighborhoods, then your site can get penalized or even deindexed.

Here is a screenshot of a message some website owners have received courtesy of Google:.