Who is behind priorities usa

A joint project of the Sunlight Foundation and the Center for Responsive Politics finds that President Obama's political nonprofit continues to find new five-figure prospects even as fundraising drops.

Though we can't predict the rhetorical tropes--not the thematic structure or the memorable lines or phrases that will fall flat--a look at the world of influence might tell us some of the issues President Barack Obama will touch on in his fourth State of the Union address. If a part of politics is rewarding your friends while giving your opponents good government , then the contest--which featured history's first billion-dollar presidential campaign Obama's , first billion-dollar-plus outside spending campaign, plus oodles of special interest cash flowing to congressional candidates--leaves a lot of ground to cover.

At least 15 of them have business before the federal government, either directly, or through companies they own large stakes in, either from their own efforts or through inheritance. A Sunlight analysis of these donors' influence profiles in Washington suggest that some of them were thanking the president for favors already accorded, while others may have been donating with the hope of receiving favors in the second term.

Just because some big players lost their shirts with their Election Day gamble doesn't mean Big Money won't be back at the table in upcoming contests. Now we understand why. Priorities released a memo in the wake of the disappointing election results in Virginia and New Jersey that offered insights into how it plans to approach the midterms.

These programs must include early persuasion campaigns targeting those with little partisan connection or long-term political interest.

We need to appeal to those swing voters who supported Democrats in and Priorities USA stands out among the top-level outside spenders on the left. As the Democratic Party debates the best ways to capitalize on its historic fundraising, Priorities seems intent on correcting mistakes and pushing beyond traditional PAC expenditures.

However, like most of its peers, Priorities is still primarily focused on national-level campaigns and multi-million dollar ad buys. Most of its top donors are among the richest of liberal allies, giving seven or eight-figure amounts in a single election cycle, meaning small dollars are unlikely to have much of an impact. For these reasons, Blue Tent ranks Priorities USA as a low priority , and advises progressive donors to only consider giving to the group. Small donors should instead focus their funds on year-round, grassroots organizing efforts, as well as direct contributions to progressive candidates running in the midterms or for state and local offices.

Skip to main content. What are its core strategies? What is its track record of achieving its goals? Does it have strong leadership and governance? Is its staff diverse and culturally competent? What kinds of donors support it? Does it have clear and realistic plans for the future? Back to Search Results. To a significant degree, her campaign is funded by Wall Street and big money interests.

And most of those donors give hefty sums of money. Abrams has championed voting rights after losing to Republican Brian Kemp, claiming that voter suppression had made her lose the election. As of the close of its election cycle, the following individuals served as directors of Priorities USA Action [65] :. Accessed July 12, August 17, April 7, October 27, May 16, April 10,